AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
The Great Gatsby free11/13/2023 ![]() Both stories shared with the audiences to show that money can’t buy happiness. Obviously, the representation of fate was faced throughout the stories. ![]() This is where he lived happily ever after (it is written). After the show he goes to train station and sees Latika. Jamal in the Slumdog Millionaire chooses to enter the game show ‘Who wants to be a millionaire’ as he believed that it is the best way to find Latika and he won. This is in contrast to Jamal’s situation in scene 7. Furthermore, this shows that Gatsby’s wealth and status doesn’t matter. Gatsby chooses to try to win her back, but fails. Eventually, Daisy chose to stay with Tom. As he comes to realize this, Gatsby accepts death as and blames himself for Myrtle’s loss. However, in an added chapter of the novel, in the end, Gatsby’s plan turns out to be out of his control. Notably, this belief is represented successfully in the line “Can’t repeat past? Why of course you can!” in which it shows how Gatsby’s fate of reuniting again with Daisy. ![]() Gatsby’s free will in choosing to believe he could win back the love of his life Daisy through his wealth and social success. Here are two characters Gatsby and Jamal from very different social environments who had very different outcomes in their pursuit of a love interest. ![]() Interestingly, each of these works depicts a character pursuing a love interest. The representation of fate of both protagonists’ relationship was shown in different text types, novel and film. The novelist generated Gatsby to be the protagonist – wealthy and a powerful man and this is in contrast to the protagonist of the film, Jamal, who came from the slums of Mumbai and works as a tea server. Brilliantly, the author of the book and the director of the movie have an opposite social context of their protagonists. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |